In a message dated 8/25/2005 7:20:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com writes: 1Ds Mk III prediction (was new canons) The essential tool is built into the digital camera I use and is called a histogram! I use it all the time, and I think it will remain the only way to get optimum exposure. Incidentally I think Nikon have tweaked their auto-exposure system to give better results from digital, certainly my experience suggests that the D70 is an improvement in this respect on the D100. Regards, Peter Marshall I look to histograms as a second or third opinion most times. I don't like interpretive results to what should be an objective measurement of illuminance on the subject. I use a twin Minolta Flashmeter V's (for a second opinion) as I can't afford to look at monitors and some engineer's undocument idea of a highlight threshold point. By using Photoshop's Info Palette tools, I create a peak diffues white value from a curved surface with a single light and adjust the meter until I reach that point. With custom white balance, this prevents clipping from ever occuring. From there all other recordable tonal values follow for the particular camera/settings in question. White on white and Black on black are instance where histograms are hopeless. With a good incident system and a twin meter for a second opinion, there's no need for interpretation. This simple techique allows me to record any scene with a perfect exposure and make B&W prints with the longest scale possible from top to bottom. Claude [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3374
2005-08-25 by claudej1@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.