Digital BW, The Print

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> 
wrote:
 
> I downloaded a set of profiles that included EAM and they showed up in the
> paper selection box.  I don't know if these were intended for the ver. 6 and
> won't work, since I don't have the right inks in there now.
> 
> >I really didn't see any difference in image quality with my 1200
> >between the two versions.
> 
> That's what I was most interested in.  Of course, if the EAM profile doesn't
> work, that could be worth something.  I've always used the Cone Tech Matte
> profile.  Do you see any significant differences between these two with 
EAM?

Paul,

the latest EAM profile for 4 color printers  (1160 in my case) runs identically 
between piezoBW driver versions 512 and 602. 

As for the difference between the latest EAM and CTmatte profiles, please see 
the graph I just uploaded in Files>Message Related Files>Dec 01

The graph is based on the values obtained when I subtract the ct matte 
densities from the eam densities (i.e. density difference = EAM-CTmatte).


Antonis