Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] 1Ds Mk III prediction (was new canons)

2005-08-25 by Richard Corbett

You can do that already using a Canon.

Richard

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Kale" <stevekale@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] 1Ds Mk III prediction (was new canons)


Yes the histogramme is a histo of the inbuilt jpeg conversion.  The inherent
problem is the metering which is still "multi-point expose for mid grey" (if
that's an appropriate abbreviation).  For digital things become a little
more complex.  Ideally the metering system would determine the brightest
portion in the frame and expose that at white or just fractionally under -
letting the other points fall as they may. (Think of a right-justified
histogramme with nothing blown.)  The issue with this is a specular
highlight (which should be blown) could upset the overall exposure and
detail could be lost in the shadows where there are so few levels.  [But
personally I would rather see a non-blown histo displayed and then choose to
blow the specular highlights if necessary with exposure compensation.]  The
conversion to jpeg (and hence the histogramme formation) would require
something more like ACR's auto exposure adjustment to rebalance the image
levels to a more normal (multi-point expose for grey) exposure.  Then we
have many more levels in the lower half of the histogramme to work with.


> From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 02:28:07 -0700
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] 1Ds Mk III prediction (was new canons)
>
>> From: Peter Marshall
>>
>> The essential tool is built into the digital camera I use and is called
>> a histogram!
>>
>> I use it all the time, and I think it will remain the only way to get
>> optimum exposure. Incidentally I think Nikon have tweaked their
>> auto-exposure system to give better results from digital, certainly my
>> experience suggests that the D70 is an improvement in this respect on
>> the D100.
>
> Trouble is, it only works _after_ shooting. If you want to know if 
> individual
> pixels are clipped, you can't deduce that from a conventional exposure
> meter--you have to look at all the pixels coming off the sensor, which
> basically means you have to take the picture.
>
> I'd like to see an indicator in the viewfinder that tells if more than a
> certain small fraction of pixels have clipping in them.
>
> -- 
>
> Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
> Paul                mailto:pderocco@...





Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as 
they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to 
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same 
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep 
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. 
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the 
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W 
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from 
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and 
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and 
Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT 
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND 
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU 
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY 
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, 
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND 
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE 
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY 
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR 
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY 
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER 
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.

Yahoo! Groups Links






---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility
to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are
currently using to read this email. ]


---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility 
to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are
currently using to read this email. ]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.