You can do that already using a Canon. Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Kale" <stevekale@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] 1Ds Mk III prediction (was new canons) Yes the histogramme is a histo of the inbuilt jpeg conversion. The inherent problem is the metering which is still "multi-point expose for mid grey" (if that's an appropriate abbreviation). For digital things become a little more complex. Ideally the metering system would determine the brightest portion in the frame and expose that at white or just fractionally under - letting the other points fall as they may. (Think of a right-justified histogramme with nothing blown.) The issue with this is a specular highlight (which should be blown) could upset the overall exposure and detail could be lost in the shadows where there are so few levels. [But personally I would rather see a non-blown histo displayed and then choose to blow the specular highlights if necessary with exposure compensation.] The conversion to jpeg (and hence the histogramme formation) would require something more like ACR's auto exposure adjustment to rebalance the image levels to a more normal (multi-point expose for grey) exposure. Then we have many more levels in the lower half of the histogramme to work with. > From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 02:28:07 -0700 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] 1Ds Mk III prediction (was new canons) > >> From: Peter Marshall >> >> The essential tool is built into the digital camera I use and is called >> a histogram! >> >> I use it all the time, and I think it will remain the only way to get >> optimum exposure. Incidentally I think Nikon have tweaked their >> auto-exposure system to give better results from digital, certainly my >> experience suggests that the D70 is an improvement in this respect on >> the D100. > > Trouble is, it only works _after_ shooting. If you want to know if > individual > pixels are clipped, you can't deduce that from a conventional exposure > meter--you have to look at all the pixels coming off the sensor, which > basically means you have to take the picture. > > I'd like to see an indicator in the viewfinder that tells if more than a > certain small fraction of pixels have clipping in them. > > -- > > Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco > Paul mailto:pderocco@... Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links --- [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are currently using to read this email. ] --- [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are currently using to read this email. ]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 1Ds Mk III prediction (was new canons)
2005-08-25 by Richard Corbett
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.