Digital BW, The Print

Clayton,

Would you mind clarifying that in numeric terms from best quality to worst for 
both ratings you are giving. (e.g. I'm not clear on whether to read the 2200 as 
having the most coarseness or the least, and etc. for the rest.) Thanks.

Craig


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <
cj@c...> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> For general coarseness I'd say 2200 1st, 870 2nd, R200 3rd.  For
> banding visible to the eye I'd swap the R200 and 870 positions.  From
> normal viewing distance they all look excellent.
> 
> Regards,
> Clayton
> 
> 
> Info on black and white digital printing at    
> http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm