On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:28:01PM -0700, Paul Roark wrote:
>
> If you have no interest in matte paper, then I'd put MIS PKN (neutral photo
> black) in the K position. It gets a better dmax than the standard PK, and
> it also avoids the warm cross-over that occurs if pure carbon is used as a
> black ink.
Is this good advice for a 1280/UT2 user too?
I have Eboni loaded, but I find I like the look of Ilford Smooth
Pearl a lot better than that of EEM. (I haven't opened my package
of HPR yet, because I'm told it looks like EEM.) So am I better off
using PK -- or PKN? I notice PKN isn't listed here:
<http://www.inksupply.com/ut2-1280.cfm#ubi>
Will I get better prints (in terms of looks or longevity) on ISP
if I replace sepia with GLOP?
If I do go for PKN and/or GLOP, will I need to make my own curves?
How are neutral 1280/UT2 prints on ISP likely to change over time?
I'm not asking for hard quantitative data, just something brief I can
say to someone interested in buying a print.
Thanks in advance.
--
Ben Rosengart ben@...
"Young people should be seen and not heard, because they're
good-looking but not too bright. We're pretty bright now,
but we're ugly." -- Grace Slick on the '60s youth movementMessage
Re: [Digital BW] Permajet MonoChrome Pro ink formulation
2005-08-30 by Ben Rosengart
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.