On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:50:14PM -0700, Paul Roark wrote:
> Ben,
>
> If the highlight dots are not a problem for you, then
> the UT2-LM is what I'd recommend starting with in the Y position.
That's what I'll do, then.
> > Are matte papers the only ones from any mfg with good archival qualities?
>
> No, Epson Premium papers (Premium Glossy, Premium Semigloss, and Premium
> Semimatte) are all good papers that get good ratings from Wilhelm.
> Additionally, Costco Kirkland Glossy inkjet paper is the cheapest and one of
> the best papers there is in my view.
This is good news.
I can't experiment with these until I replace Eboni with a photo
black, right?
> How long these glossy prints will last in the real world is still an
> unknown. In light of matte paper's susceptibility to physical damage, I
> would not be surprised if a sprayed (PremierArt Print Shield) glossy print
> was the best looking after 50 years.
Oy, spraying. I was hoping to avoid that particular can of worms. (I
live in a small apartment, and my lungs are not so great to begin with.)
--
Ben Rosengart ben@...
"Young people should be seen and not heard, because they're
good-looking but not too bright. We're pretty bright now,
but we're ugly." -- Grace Slick on the '60s youth movementMessage
Re: [Digital BW] 1280 UT2 without sepia; plus, some archival questions
2005-08-31 by Ben Rosengart
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.