Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

So if not the 1280... relatively painless 13x19 for a C8x user?

2005-09-07 by Intrinsic Pictures

I've loved my trial experience with my C84 and UT-EZ inks (well...at 
least with the matte papers). Now I want to do the same in a larger 
format. This seemed to point directly to the 1280, where I could branch 
out a little into simple toning, or default to the sliders if I didn't 
want to mess with it.

Now I read (and recall reading previously over the years) all the 
horror stories about the 1280, clogs from hell, dye printers maybe not 
being the best for pigs, etc. I don't have the time or patience to 
fiddle with a fussy printer every day. I'm a knowledgeable Photoshop 
user, but would prefer a more intuitive solution than transfer curves.

So is it still possible to get relatively painless 13x19-ish black & 
white using the Epson driver and UT inks? In an ideal world, they'd 
match the output from my C84 with EZ-N so I could continue to use and 
sell both seamlessly.

TIA,
Doug
www.IntrinsicPictures.com

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.