Bob, I think the test you created is interesting, but not directly useable for evaluating interpolation routines. Vertical B/W lines one pixel wide is right at the nyquist limit for spatial frequency. Pushing that data through any filter will look rather messy compared to more picture like image data. For example, a headshot portrait and willow tree without leaves may look better up-sized and sharpened using different routines. On the other hand, if the headshot is of a lion, and you have the whiskers in focus, maybe not. :-) Best regards, John Moody -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Bob Frost Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 4:30 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Stair interpolation - was Genuine Fractals Paul, They do, but as I said using Bicubic simply blurs the bands - they are still there. Try it yourself, it only takes a few moments. Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@...> Sure, if you use Nearest Neighbor. But I'm under the impression that the various stairstep upsampling actions that people gush about use repeated iterations of Bicubic. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Stair interpolation - was Genuine Fractals
2005-09-07 by John Moody
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.