I have been using one batch of MIS PK purchased about 6 weeks ago (never used it before) and was quite unhappy with DMAX on any paper: I tried 3 "microceramic" types, at any ink coverage. (I do not use QTR so far, but tryed the calibration process once to see how it works. My scanner is not good enough for linearisation, but calibration patches allow very rough density assessments.) I am not reaching D=2 on an epson 1270, ever. FS-N dark greys are denser, and I have used Paul's curves that do not use the black (very slightly modified for one reason or another) to get excellent results. The change in ink base makes it difficult to know what to do, and whether the PK batch was worse than usual or if we (who get weak PK blacks) have another problem 9and could still have it with the new base). Paul's explanation of pigment overload seems plausible, but I wonder if there is something else going on too, in the case of the low density we see as it seems to contradict other posts of PK performance. My only regret is that I got a pint of PK with the old base - I have no idea what it is good for (well it does ~OK in my colour gloss printer but I won't say more about that here). Ken > > semi-gloss media. The biggest problem I've encountered is that the MIS > > Photo Black ink is simply not very dense.
Message
Re: Weak blacks with UT7 PK and PKN
2005-09-09 by kenstrain2000
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.