The PMA-568 adhesive comes with a hard plastic squeegee, and I suspect many people don't really press it down thoroughly and completely, leading to future release. I use a rubber J roller, like what is used for laminating or veneering with contact cement. I assure you it is very permanent after that, and _can't_ be removed. Best regards, John Moody -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of photoian@... Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:07 PM To: Group Subject: [Digital BW] Re:FAQ? HP 8750 vs Epson 2400 for B&W My suggestion is to dry mount it; I do that with all my prints , inkjet and other and have never had a problem. There are psa systems but my experience is that they ultimately start to let go and billow up toward the glass. Ian Message: 3 Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:10:03 -0000 From: "Mark Hahn" <markhahn2000@...> Subject: Re: FAQ? HP 8750 vs. Epson R2400 for B&W ok, I was the one who mentioned HP Premium Plus Glossy puckering up and contacting the glass when hinged behind an 8-ply museum mat. If a traditional archival hinged mat sandwich is the wrong way to mount this paper, what are you saying is the right way to do it? mark [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re:FAQ? HP 8750 vs Epson 2400 for B&W
2005-09-09 by John Moody
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.