Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re:FAQ? HP 8750 vs Epson 2400 for B&W

2005-09-09 by John Moody

The PMA-568 adhesive comes with a hard plastic squeegee, and I suspect many
people don't really press it down thoroughly and completely, leading to
future release.
I use a rubber J roller, like what is used for laminating or veneering with
contact cement.  I assure you it is very permanent after that, and _can't_
be removed.

Best regards,
John Moody

-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
photoian@...
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:07 PM
To: Group
Subject: [Digital BW] Re:FAQ? HP 8750 vs Epson 2400 for B&W

My suggestion is to dry mount it; I do that with all my prints , inkjet and
other and have never had a problem. There are psa systems but my experience
is that they ultimately start to let go and billow up toward the glass.

Ian



Message: 3
   Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:10:03 -0000
   From: "Mark Hahn" <markhahn2000@...>
Subject: Re: FAQ? HP 8750 vs. Epson R2400 for B&W

ok, I was the one who mentioned HP Premium Plus Glossy puckering up and
contacting the glass when hinged behind an 8-ply museum mat.  If a
traditional archival hinged mat sandwich is the wrong way to mount this
paper, what are you saying is the right way to do it?

mark




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.