That sounds good. Eliminating PKN should give you slightly better Dmax, and control over tone; well worth the effort. I imagine there is variation among units. My R200, while quite good, has micro-banding that my 2200 does not. I have done a half dozen head alignments, and even tried the un-align trick. Its just not as good as _my_ 2200, but the price/performance is outstanding. Im obsessing a little; the prints look great. Im guessing that Ill eventually end up with K7 in my 2200 or a used 4000, but Im enjoying playing with the R200 and QTR. I have a lot to learn yet. Best regards, John Moody -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of santonov2you Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 1:26 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] UT7 on R200: which 6 of seven inks to use? Thanks, John! I spent some time last night and created the first profile. I used PKN, UT7-C, UT7-LC, UT7-M, UT7-LM and FSN-Y. Yes, I copied curves for M and LM from C and LC. Next step will be eliminating PKN, I see it makes the profile worse. In general prints already looks OK and very smooth indeed. I am surprised that this little printer that I got just for $50 is able to produce same or better quality prints as my 2200. -Sergei [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] UT7 on R200: which 6 of seven inks to use?
2005-09-23 by John Moody
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.