Digital BW, The Print

ALL: I couldn't agree more fully with John Kelly's
statement below.  Some of the posts on this subject
such as the one below from Steve Kale have terribly
degenerated into personal attacks and insults, and i
join John in decrying them.  Opinions obviously vary,
but those who wish in indulge in this kind of
infintile ranting should keep it to themselves and not
inflict it upon the rest (dare i say - the vast
majority) of us.   Thank you all for your helpful,
thoughtful comments and intellegent questions...

Michael J. Vendrell, M.D.

--- djon43 <djon43@...> wrote:

> Clayton's posts are ALWAYS valuable...it's obviously
> intentionally
> hurtful to describe any of his posts as "irrelevant
> and unhelpful." 
> 
> He is, after all, one of the few who communicates
> important things
> about digital printing clearly.
> 
> John Kelly
> Albuquerque
> 
>
____________________________________________________________
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com,
> "Steve Kale"
> <stevekale@b...> wrote:
> > An interesting ramble but one totally irrelevant
> and unhelpful to
> the original poster.
> > 
> > ________________ Reply Header ________________
> > Subject:	[Digital BW] Re: Color Management without
> instruments (T vs PR)
> > Author:	"Claytons Jones" <cj@c...>
> > Date:		30th September 2005 1:26:56 pm
> > 
> > Hello John,
> > 
> > >There is little point in trying to convert
> someone who argues
> > >against _your_ preferred workflow.  Responding to
> someone who 
> > >objects to using a level of control they feel is
> pointless and 
> > >unnecessary is, in itself, pointless and
> unnecessary.
> > 
> > Thank you!  This is the first statement containing
> any real wisdom so
> > far in this thread.  
> > 
> > This discussion is actually just the latest guise
> of the age-old
> > debate between the Theorist and the Practical
> Realist, and this is
> > a replay of a similar one last April (see
> "Matching Monitor and
> > Print", April 10-15, 2005) which had some of the
> same players.  
> > 
> > The statements of the theorist are usually true
> and can't be logically
> > argued against.  But the Practical Reality is that
> it doesn't have to
> > be done that way.  The theorist says that the high
> tech approach is
> > more accurate and saves time, paper and ink, and
> he is theoretically
> > correct.  The practical realist knows that, while
> true, the difference
> > is usually not worth the extra effort and expense.
>   
> 
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com