> From: Greg <dfaprinting@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:53:28 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Color Management without instruments (T vs PR ) > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale > <stevekale@b...> wrote: >> Carl >> >> Not sure that you will get much from it versus a custom colour > profile. It >> is designed to realign the printer driver LUTs to normalise > output. But you >> still need to do the exercise for each Epson paper, ie each LUT. > Unless you >> are trying to standardise things such that multiple machines can > use the >> same profiles (rather than trying to store a different profile set > for each >> machine) it is unlikely to be advantageous. The only real > exception is if >> the LUTs are so far out-of-whack with the output that the CMM and > custom >> profile are being over-extended. At any rate, it's a colour profile >> workflow option/solution and not very helpful for B&W. >> >> Steve > > It should be linearizing the printer to each paper, and that should > also extend to the ABW printing. Nope. But luckily thanks to Roy we can ICC profile Epson Adv B&W output and use colour management technology at long last. >It should also allow you to get a > profile once, and then just keep after the linearization to allow > that profile to continue working as the printer changes. Same as re-profiling the printer over time. Good practice although they are actually quite stable devices.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Color Management without instruments (T vs PR )
2005-10-03 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.