Clayton Jones wrote: > I add my voice to what Paul and Richard have said, especially this: > > Paul: "I recommend people get on the learning curve cheaply and > easily. Once one starts actually printing, the issues here will > have more context and make more sense." > > This is good advice, and the C86 is a great way to get started. If > you already have a 2200 then Black Only (BO) is an easy and > inexpensive way to get started, or QTR with its provided curves if you > want to get into that approach. I concur with Paul and Clayton. I have fifteen years of experience with digital imaging, and almost a decade at color inkjet printing, but six months ago I had strictly entry-level theoretical knowledge of B&W inkjet printing, and no actual experience. Although I have a 2200, I decided to forgo BO in favor of exploring third party insets and trying to learn what was involved in getting good results from a system and process I found somewhat mysterious. So I bought a C86. Six months later, I can say that what is spoken of on this group makes a great deal more sense to me than it did when I was just reading peoples' summaries, and I think I'm in a much better position to figure out what is likely to work for me, and not. -- Jeff Medkeff Eagle River, Alaska
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Search for the Holy Grail - The Perfect B&W Print - Can It Be Made on a Comp
2005-10-08 by Jeff Medkeff
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.