--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" <deanwork2003@y...> wrote: > > Kodak, integrity? Give me a break. I delt with their tech reps for > years about this issue of their Ektacolor paper fading. I saw > classmates of mine in undergraduate school produce outstanding work > that faded in no time. Kodak knew their dyes would shift badly. > Eventually when Fuji had came up with a better solution and rather > than try to improve the stability of own their papers they just > resented Fuji and badmouthed their research. That is why they are > dying right now. George Eastmant would turn over in his grave. Their > answer was to claim to us that their color technology was stable, it > wasn't. Ask any portrait photographer from any decade. Kodak could > have made a better product they just didn't care about longevity, > never did. They had always owned the world. Well, they lost it. > Wasn't this exactly what prompted Wilhelm to get started? I think I read that in his book on image permanence. You can download the PDF at his site.
Message
Re: Kodak White Paper on Image Stability
2005-10-12 by Greg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.