Hello, I was at an exhibition yesterday and got into a discussion with a photographer who'd used Pan F for a photo and I asked how she found Pan F and Delta 100 compared. She said Pan F had finer grain because it was a lower ASA. I said that they were different technologies and Delta had tabular grain. Her reply was lower ASA = smaller grain. End of story. So ... I had a look at some 10x15 prints of mine and from the few prints I've done, it looks like she might be right. It also depends on how aggressive I was with the curves on those images of course, as that accentuates grain, too ... Any thoughts? thanks, Richard -- http://smallfield.vze.com http://photos.smallfield.vze.com "Programming is an endless race between the software engineer, who seeks to design increasingly idiot-proof code, and the Universe, which strives to produce even bigger idiots." --anon
Message
Pan F vs Delta 100
2005-10-16 by Richard Smallfield