>Paul Roark wrote: > > > > I printed a 21-step test file with the icc that was created with this > > system, and the ramp is relatively dark with very compressed 90% - 100% > > steps. It's not what I'd like to see as a final density distribution. Steve wrote: > ... Remember the colour > management at work in showing the image on your display (no soft proof or > anything) is doing an identical thing. ... > Adobe CMM is mapping the file black to your monitor's black point, > most likely with relative colormetric intent and > black point compensation (so there is no clipping). > So this is exactly the > same thing as what the printer ICC profile is doing > only the printer black is even worse. > So the point to remember is that you have been looking at > this sort of scaling all the time for years. It is about the same as what the monitor does, if not "corrected" with a custom dot gain curve. However, looking at if from the perspective of what makes the best print, we are wasting precious grayscale. If in 8 bit, our 256 steps is reduced to about 218 effective steps. I'm not sure that is a wise compromise at all. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] ICC v. Transfer Function in Epson driver
2005-10-18 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.