When working on a curve description, I strip scan the 21-gray target. For the final readings, I use patch method, which seems to be more repeatable, to create the icc profile. For 21 patches, that seems fastest, for > 21 patches multiple reads and average using measuretool would be faster. Best regards, John Moody -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of wwodets Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 11:45 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] i1 Target Scanning technique . . . I wondering about the actual techniques people are using to scan targets, for example the QTR Random Gray 51. The issues I can think of are ambient light, patch versus strip, speed on strip scanning, random versus "linear" targets. Perhaps there are others. Thanks, Walt [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] i1 Target Scanning technique . . .
2005-10-20 by John Moody
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.