Steve and Carl, I think this may be the very issue I mention in the last post. When you are printing with CM, it is VERY IMPORTANT to know what the embedded profile is. Carl says here Gray Lab but I think Steve is using GG 2.2 (not positive though) so they a supposed to get different results. Roy --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield <scho@m...> wrote: > > Steve, > > I seem to be getting results that are different from what you are > seeing. Below is a comparison of density and Lab-L, with and without > icc profile. Printed with 2400, MK, Hahnemuhle PR BW, using default > ABW neutral-darker settings and 2880 dpi (RPM). QTR gray lab working > space. Create-icc (2.3.2) used to make the icc profile form the new > step-wedge (10, 5, 1 % steps), but standard 21 step used for print > with the icc applied. Note that without the icc there is some > compression in the shadow region that is improved with the icc. > > Carl >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] ICC v. Transfer Function in Epson driver
2005-10-21 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.