The Epson "K3" printing approach (2400 - 9800) is really a breakthrough for B&W compared to past Epson approaches. The questions I have relate to the extent of longevity disadvantage, if any, due to two issues. First, the k3 Advanced B&W driver still uses more than the minimum necessary color inks. (A rip can solve this problem.) Second, there are some who think blended B&W inks are more lightfast than when the color inks are used separately. I hope to test both of these issues in a fade test that I might even start today. (It takes a month before I have any initial results.) The results of this test will be a major factor in whether I make a B&W mix for my 2400. In any case, the k3 approach produces excellent B&W prints -- with OEM or MIS inks. (I don't know if the MIS web site lists the MIS 2400 inks yet). Paul www.PaulRoark.com > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > steveabrink > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 6:41 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] B&W quality of 2400/4800 vs QTR > > I recently saw some B&W prints on a 2400 using Kirkland glossy paper > and they were amazingly good for just hitting a couple of buttons... I > believe they were at least as good my QTR semi-matte prints on a 4000 > and probably better(!)using the stock profiles. I don't make my own > QTR profiles because I just don't have time. My question is for those > who are linearising output and doing custom paper profiles in QTR etc., > have you compared them with the 2400/4800 stock B&W prints,and if so, > how did they compare? I've thought of trying to find the time to delve > into doing my own custom profiles if they're was a vast improvement, > but I just don't know how they really compare...? Given the price > break on the 4800 and other improvements I'm thinking this might be an > easy but high quality option ... > Thanks! > SteveB > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from > the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files > section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Message
RE: [Digital BW] B&W quality of 2400/4800 vs QTR
2005-10-22 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.