Yes, the dmax is lower than RC papers, but still slightly higher (with MK, about 1.7-1.8) than regular matte cotton papers. On Oct 22, 2005, at 11:58 AM, Jim Goshorn wrote: > > On Oct 22, 2005, at 9:18 AM, Carl Schofield wrote: > > >> Not at all like the Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Satin >> which has a more subtle finish. >> > > Even though it says satin, according to the description at InkJet > Mall, it appears to still be classified as a matte paper so isn't the > D-Max still lower than a photo paper like Premium Luster? > > Jim >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Premier Luster Rag Smooth
2005-10-22 by Carl Schofield