then obviously they are different, I haven't used it in a long time. Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> wrote: > > Well all I can say is that I am looking at a sheet of each now. They have a > different coating. EVFA is much brighter with a slightly smoother finish. > Dmax with Eboni (using Adv B&W on my 4800) is L*=15.7 for EVFA and L*=22.3 > for SVE (each relatively soon after printing). > > > > From: Tyler Boley <tyler@t...> > > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:32:42 -0000 > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 2400 Shadow separation and linearity . . . > > > > No matter who does what where when with it, it used to perform the > > same. Perhaps it has been changed. > > T > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale > > <stevekale@b...> wrote: > >> > >> My understanding is that St Cuthberts Mill ships the substrate and then > >> Epson has its own (or more likely yet another third party) coating > > and so > >> performs much better than Somerset Velvet Enhanced. I agree the > > Somerset > >> product isn't that great re density but has a nice finish. I have a > > couple > >> of unused boxes tucked away somewhere - not bad ink blotter paper ;-) >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: 2400 Shadow separation and linearity . . .
2005-10-22 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.