Digital BW, The Print

Looks fine -- but then again, it's hard to tell what you should be getting.

The real question should be:  what does the graph of "the screen" look like?
In other words and more important which matches what you see on the screen.
I don't know of anyway to "measure" this match accuracy.  But that's what
I think we really want to know.

Roy

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> 
wrote:
>
> I believe that the graph in the document "Linear vs ICC L* Output" is a much
> more accurate depiction of the effect of QTR ICC colour management of my QTR
> HPR greyscale curves.
> 
> http://homepage.mac.com/stevekale/stevekale2/FileSharing37.html
> 
> Please correct me if I am wrong!  I read the L* in the Lab info palette for
> each patch given my GG2.2 workspace and plotted this expected number vs the
> actual output of the print.
> 
> 
> > From: Steve Kale <stevekale@b...>
> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:50:52 +0100
> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> > Conversation: [Digital BW] ICC v. Transfer Function in Epson driver
> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] ICC v. Transfer Function in Epson driver
> > 
> > I agree though that for each colour managed line I should have plotted the
> > L* expected by the colour patch given my workspace against the actual
> > achieved, rather than the "step vs the L*" - I agree the step is no longer
> > valid - and compared this against the linear line of the non colour-managed
> > output.
>