--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> wrote: > > That gets a bit circular doesn't it? The first question is does the scaling > make sense and then the second is whether the soft proof implementation was > done correctly. One could get a match between display and print but still > not have a visually appealing result in print. Lost me there. It seems to me the point of much of this (I admitt to ADD with regard to this thread) is to get to a point of wysiwyg. When that is in order, now it's up to you to make it pleasing. That's the way it's working here anyway. ... > I still have a tough time with the soft proofs though. The black point > shift on screen seems excessive.... ... > (BTW it is interesting to note that the dynamic range we can achieve in B&W > on photo paper now exceeds a quality display. You can't soft proof the > print range!) I think you can (or get very close), and soft-proof's implementation needs a little more work. I think it's conceptually sound. Tyler
Message
Re: [Digital BW] ICC v. Transfer Function in Epson driver
2005-10-23 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.