Interesting. Sorry I did not know that. They can't conform to spec. Apologies. I guess my exception turned out not to be an exception after all. > From: Tom Baker <tbaker1328@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:35:21 -0700 (PDT) > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] ICC v. Transfer Function in Epson driver > > According to Colorbyte the B&W "profiles" are not "real" profiles. They would > not be recognized by any other application as an ICC profile. Therefore, I > theink applying ICC to them is a misnomer. > > Their color profiles are recognized by any application that know about ICC > profiles, but not the b&w. > > Tom Baker > > Steve Kale <stevekale@...> wrote: > Of course it is. They profile the response of the printer driven by the IP > driver. They only have relevance if you have that driver. Same as a Gretag > Macbeth profile of the Epson driver's response is only relevant to that > Epson driver. You can't profile the Imageprint driver and expect it to > represent the performance of the Epson driver. > > >> From: Tom Baker <tbaker1328@...> > >> >> Why do you say IP's approach to b&w is ICC. It's not. You can not use IP's >> b&w "profiles" anywhere except in IP. >> >> Tom Baker
Message
Re: [Digital BW] ICC v. Transfer Function in Epson driver
2005-10-24 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.