I suspect that this how it works -- that they are linked by the PS code. If anyone finds a counter-example I like to see it. I don't think any of this is documented so examples tend to be the best info. I think there may be CM systems that don't handle BPC the way PS does. This may be why Epson provides profiles with it builtin. Roy --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Moody" <moodymz3@y...> wrote: > > I don't see any profiles that allow simulate paper color without simulate > black ink unless they don't have a bkpt tag, so its moot. Am I missing > something? > An interesting example is SPR2400 ProofingSemimatte.icm which does not have > a bkpt tag, yet SPR2400 PremSmgls PhotoRPM.icc does. > > Does that suggest Epson knows most people don't want to simulate paper black > while softproofing? If any profile were to be used for softproofing, I > would think ProofingSemimatte would be it. > > Best regards, > John Moody > > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Steve Kale > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 11:34 AM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] ICC Soft Proofing -- The issue . . . > > > Yes but I think the thing we don't understand is why some profiles allow > these operations and others don't. That is we need, ideally, to figure out > what PS grabs from the ICC profile. >
Message
Re: ICC Soft Proofing -- The issue . . .
2005-10-25 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.