"John Moody" <moodymz3@y...> wrote: > > Have you used QTR-create-ICC to profile both BO and the curves you are using > with QTR? That would output both prints with the same tonal characteristic. > If this has not been done, I wonder if the BO shadow compression is > generating more contrast in the features that appear sharp? John, May I ask you to try that? I don't have your expertise: I'd be very interested in your results (comparing best QTR sharpness to BO). I hate to be the only person reporting a QTR sharpness problem...maybe I'm really describing MY problem, rather than a flaw in QTR... ...it seems a fault if QTR requires a profile that matches BO in order to arrive at maximum sharpness. It also seems a fault if it requires different post-processing sharpning (as it may). BO obviously does create more contrast in shadow details* than QTR, but "smart sharpen" of shadows (one of the Photoshop "smart sharpen" adjustments) in post-processing does cause QTR to approximate BO sharpness...a matter of tinkering. * shadow details for Photoshop CS2's "smart sharpen" seems to mean control of dark areas that contain whites as opposed to control of dark details contained by whites...in practice this is not the same thing.
Message
QTR vs BO sharpness
2005-11-08 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.