Good points, Bruce. I intend to mat them, so I should probably stick to 30 x 40 too. Just curious what's your finished size on a 30 x 40 print, including the mat? And I'll either get 6" tubes or have them packaged between sheets of foam core. Mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, hogarth@s... wrote: > > mccarvill wrote: > > > I'm planning to order some 40x50 prints on an Epson 9600 in the near > > future and would be interested in recommendations and advice from those > > with experience printing at this size. > > > > One print shop I contacted has recommended against my first choice for > > paper (Epson premium luster), saying it's relatively thin, so large > > prints are more prone to damage, creases and scuffs. He recommended > > going with a matte paper, like Epson enhanced matte or Ultrasmooth, or > > a watercolor paper. I'm not a fan of textured papers or those with > > flaking issues. What are your favorite paper in this format, especially > > among the luster or semi-glossy papers? > > > > Also, I have an option of getting the prints packaged in 3" tubes or > > flat between foamcore. Any recommendations here? > > > > Thanks > > Since you are using inches, I assume you are in the USA. You should note > that the largest "normal" size for matte boards in the USA is 40x60 > inches. This begs the question of how you are going to display your > prints. My largest size for prints on paper is around 30x40 inches > because of the 40x60 inch limitation on matte board. Anything larger I > put on canvas and frame in a floater frame without glass. But... there > are many paths to the waterfall. > > Shipping a print of any size in a 3" tube is IMHO a bad idea. Why can't > your vendor use a 6" tube? A 3" tube will most likely put a marked curl > in your print. Most art papers would be difficult to roll tight enough > to get into the tube that small, and the risk of damage in getting a > large print into a tiny tube is something to consider. > > These are just some things that your vendor should have told you be > evidently didn't. > -- > Bruce Watson >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Papers and packaging for 40x50 prints
2005-11-09 by mccarvill
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.