Greg, I just ran a few sheets through QTR on the 9600 MK from the same exact files that I used for Innova S.Cotton and H. Photorag. I don't see any visual difference in dmax at all. Actually I don't see difference between the Museo 2 and the M Max either, using the same settings on the same file, and this seems strange. The last file I did had 1/3 of the image a pure black, (Photoshop 0) and if anything the Innova looked blacker, but essentially the same and I like the Innova textures and whiteness a lot more and it is better priced. Photrag beat them all. Of course I have not made custom curves for this Crane media to control the midtone ramp, but in my experience with great papers you can pretty much tell what they are about the first time around without going through all that. It is not a significantly brighter paper either. But its good to see that they are at least back in the game....somewhere.. John --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Greg" <dfaprinting@y...> wrote: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "jamesdsteele2001" > <photographybysteele@p...> wrote: > > While the d-max (by eye) looked > > similar to other premium papers > > With what little testing I've accomplished so far, looks like dmax is > around 1.66 for my inks, but I can't tell you much more than that yet. > Benchmark dmax of around 1.73 for many of the Hahnemuhle papers. >
Message
Re: Museo Max Review
2005-11-10 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.