Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Re: "Phatte" black with Epson 4800... experiences with ColorByte

2005-11-20 by Christer Rosewell

Hello all..

I tried to post my experiences with ColorByte in regards to ImagePrint 
and the "Phatte Black" option to the Epson 4000 forum yesterday and in 
the middle of the night I got a strangely worded email from a moderator 
inviting me to "repost" my first couple of sentences:



"if you want to repost the first few sentences, feel free to.

moderator"



which makes me wonder if perhaps my posting was censored - I have yet 
to receive my daily digest of the 4000 so we'll see...

Just received the Epson 4000 Digest - my posting wasn't thers so 
obviously someone doesn't like criticism - or the truth to be told....

Anyone interested in why I am returning the software to Colorbyte, 
email me off line...

Christer


			Christer, AKA Christer Rosewell
"It's the artist's job to accomplish two things-to stir the emotions of 
the viewer
	  and to lay bare the soul of his subject." Jousuf Karsh
      		  Member EP (Editorial Photographers)
			  http://www.ChristerArt.com
		  	   3.9 million visitors to date..


On Nov 20, 2005, at 6:15 AM, 
DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com wrote:

> From: "Greg" <dfaprinting@...>
> Subject: Re: "Phatte" black with Epson 4800... with QTR?
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
> <tyler@t...> wrote:
>>
>> Since they have long argued there is no need for more than 2 blacks,
>> it's no wonder they downplay Epson going to 3, and come up with
> this,
>> admittedly, convenient solution for people who want to use both
> photo
>> and art papers.
>> Many, incuding myself, might disagree with them, and the proof is in
>> the prints.
>> Tyler
>>
>>
>
> And in my opinion they chose a very poor way to implement
> this "improvement".


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.