Re: Re: "Phatte" black with Epson 4800... experiences with ColorByte
2005-11-20 by Christer Rosewell
Hello all..
I tried to post my experiences with ColorByte in regards to ImagePrint
and the "Phatte Black" option to the Epson 4000 forum yesterday and in
the middle of the night I got a strangely worded email from a moderator
inviting me to "repost" my first couple of sentences:
"if you want to repost the first few sentences, feel free to.
moderator"
which makes me wonder if perhaps my posting was censored - I have yet
to receive my daily digest of the 4000 so we'll see...
Just received the Epson 4000 Digest - my posting wasn't thers so
obviously someone doesn't like criticism - or the truth to be told....
Anyone interested in why I am returning the software to Colorbyte,
email me off line...
Christer
Christer, AKA Christer Rosewell
"It's the artist's job to accomplish two things-to stir the emotions of
the viewer
and to lay bare the soul of his subject." Jousuf Karsh
Member EP (Editorial Photographers)
http://www.ChristerArt.com
3.9 million visitors to date..
On Nov 20, 2005, at 6:15 AM,
DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> From: "Greg" <dfaprinting@...>
> Subject: Re: "Phatte" black with Epson 4800... with QTR?
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
> <tyler@t...> wrote:
>>
>> Since they have long argued there is no need for more than 2 blacks,
>> it's no wonder they downplay Epson going to 3, and come up with
> this,
>> admittedly, convenient solution for people who want to use both
> photo
>> and art papers.
>> Many, incuding myself, might disagree with them, and the proof is in
>> the prints.
>> Tyler
>>
>>
>
> And in my opinion they chose a very poor way to implement
> this "improvement".
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]