Well I have been following this thread and the forum for a long time. I am a R2400 user and am getting great results but am having troubles matching my calibrated screen to the print. Most people say I am a pretty smart guy, but I must admit that all of the talk about gamma curves and profiles has my head spinning and I really don't think I understand what is going on here. (maybe no one does??) I don't own a spectrophotometer and feel that this is too expensive for me. I even took a course from the QTR creator and must admit also that I remain baffled as did most of the participants. If someone could provide some service to provide a resonable way to match screen and print (I use R2400, K3 inks, EPSG paper)and some instructions on how to use a "profile", I would certainly pay them or thank them. I guess my frustration stems from the apparent fact that there is no standardized method yet and that the R2400 driver lacks a clear soft proofing method so we are still using experimental workaround methods created by users trying to come to grips with this. At this point after reading all of this I am so confused what to do that I am somewhat exhausted by the whole affair. Color printing seems so stright forward. Such a pity that we haven't got something similar with B&W. Hopefully someone like Clayton will continue to work out a standardized approach and help all of us non-engineer types with a tutorial on how to proceed. Thanks for all the continuing efforts. Scott
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Solving this BW tonal management issue . . .
2005-11-22 by Scott Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.