I purchased the Premier Luster Rag from IT Supplies. Carl On Nov 23, 2005, at 8:17 PM, Paul Roark wrote: > It sounds like there is a QC problem somewhere. What retailers > were these > purchased from? > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of >> Carl >> Schofield >> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 4:40 PM >> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson Ultrasmooth vs. Premiere Hot Press >> >> I had exactly the same experience when I recently purchased a box of >> Premier Luster Rag. Ragged edges, poor packaging, scuffed paper >> surface, warped, and very stiffly curled paper out of the box. Never >> again. >> >> On Nov 23, 2005, at 4:26 PM, wwodets wrote: >> >>> I recently went to Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art for an OBA-free paper >>> and >>> was impressed with it: good image, impeccable quality, etc. >>> >>> Having heard that Premiere Hot Press was the same paper, I >>> ordered 150 >>> sheets of it. It looks like the EUS, measures like it and their >>> profiles are essentially identical. >>> >>> The Premiere paper, however, shows *terrible* quality control: bad >>> edges, miscuts, insects smashed in the coating (really) and, >>> worst of >>> all, radom scuffing of the coating that is quite visible in black >>> areas >>> of the print. >>> >>> At the same time I bought a box of the Premiere Hot Press >>> Textured and >>> these sheets were so badly cut and stiff and deformed that I had >>> difficulty loading them into the printer. It is a very rough >>> surfaced, >>> ugly, badly finished paper. >>> >>> So, if you're thinking about a Premiere paper, watch out. I was >>> shocked. >>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson Ultrasmooth vs. Premiere Hot Press
2005-11-24 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.