Just to close any gaps: I do not need to print in color on the same printer, I would be printing on photorag 308 or similar matte, ideally My goal is to match vintage Agfa 118 warm matte fiber, but I have not seen any output on inkjet that did - yet. thanks again, --mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, hogarth@s... wrote: > > I did make this choice, and went with Cone's inks and the StudioPrint RIP. > > The question you are posing, however, seems to be full of gaps. Do you > need to print color and grayscale from the same printer? Do you need to > print on non-matte paper? Do you need to match exactly a particular > shade - a warm-ish neutral? A colder selenium tone? > > Consider also the MIS inks, such as the UT7 inkset, especially if you > want to print on non-matte surfaces. > -- > Bruce Watson > > > markketzler wrote: > > > If best BW print quality, in a dedicated Epson environment (can be a > > BW only printer) were the objective would you go with: ABW, Imageprint > > or Cone dedicate BW inks. Regardless of cost or effort in producing > > the print what would you use for a new BW printing setup. If personal > > preferences is an issue make it have superb tonal scale and look just > > like vintage Agfa 118 warm matte fiber! >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] ABW vs. Cone vs. Imagprint
2005-11-26 by markketzler
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.