Lou, On the 2200 with UC color, I found Dmax peak (~1.65) at untagged rgb 30,30,30 using VFA setting. Below that it goes back up. Reducing the ink in the driver kills the color saturation. I believe it is due to the MK reaching Dmax with a lower ink load than typical, and having a much higher density vs ink slope. IMO, this paper requires a RIP to show its full potential. Too bad for Crane... Best regards, John Moody --- Louis Dina <lbdina@...> wrote: > Thanks for your comments. I didn't post my initial > findings with my > original query since I didn't want to skew any > responses. > > I bought a box of this paper and ran a few tests > using a 4000 and UC > inks, using an RGB generated grayscale and some > color patches. I was > going to profile it for color work, then if I liked > it, for B&W. The > best Dmax I got from this paper, using the Epson > driver, was 1.55, > which I considered pretty anemic, especially for the > price. I tried a > few different paper settings in the driver. Crane > suggested the EEM > setting, which I tried, but I also tried the VFA > setting, both at 1440 > dpi, SuperX microweave, No Color Adjustment, and all > the high speed and > edge smoothing features turned off. I also > downloaded their custom > profile for the 4000. It was weaker yet. > > Maybe there is a better paper setting in the driver > that will lay down > a more optimum amount of ink?? > > Any other thoughts would be appreciated. I suspect > it is the nature of > the paper, but there may be some settings I can > tweak. > > Lou Dina >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Feedback on Crane Museo Max Paper??
2005-12-01 by John Moody
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.