George, I haven't noticed image changes when converting monochrome channel mixer to grayscale by itself, but I have noticed that, with a stack of image layers and correction layers, there is a difference between Photoshop 6's "Flatten Image" command (in Windows XP) and manually flattening each layer into the one below successively to end up with a single layer. I have been surprised to see that Flatten Image makes a marked change in the screen appearance of the image while using CTRL-E from the bottom-up on a layer stack made no difference to the image. Maybe this is what you saw? As to the greenish cast, has it ever looked a more neutral gray in daylight? It's not light reflected from something green in you outdoor setting, is it? Frank ________________________________________________________ Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 05:57:36 -0000 From: "glemasurier" <george.lemasurier@...> Subject: Re: Am I crazy? Clayton, Yikes. My mistake. I just reread, too, and you do NOT say convert back to RGB for printing. Somehow, I made that assumption. I've been reading so many articles recently, I must have picked it up somewhere else. Sorry. I wondered if converting to grayscale changes the values achieved in channel mixer or whatever other BW conversion method being used? BTW, I've found your articles highly informative. I especially enjoyed the one on color settings and profiles. That's been quite helpful. Cheers, George
Message
Re: Am I crazy?
2005-12-05 by Frank Kolwicz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.