Barry may have already heard far more than he wanted or needed to hear regarding his questions, but I can't help but add this: It may be the case that you have to justify the issue and expense of monitor calibration software and hardware to people who know absolutely nothing about these things. What I have found helpful in making the kinds of points that others on this list have so keenly enumerated is to use an analogy. For example, you might say to somebody that doing this kind of work without having a high-quality monitor that can be calibrated would be like being asked to make an audio recording of musicians without having a good stereo and a good set of speakers through which to listen to the recording. Without those, how would you know if the recording you made was any good? I'm sure you can come up with other examples that may be more appropriate for the people you'll have to convince. Good luck - it sounds like an interesting project. Stephen Petegorsky
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Monitor Calibration Hardware Justification/ NINCH Guidelines
2005-12-06 by petegorsky@external.umass.edu