A 16megapixel camera gives an 8bit RGB file of around 48MB. Stop being a diehard ! TonyR On 08/12/2005 11:15:06, garethjolly wrote: > I'll confess, I'm a film die hard. > > But I recently saw a very impressive print from a Canon 16 megapixel SLR. > > It would have been maybe 1.2 x 40 cm. > > Now, logic tells me film should be better. I scan a B&W image at 4000 > dpi - it resolves down to a level where the grain is just perceptible > as film grain using Tri X developed in Xtol. That yields a 42MB file > with 16 bit grayscale. And that's B&W so a colour file would be > around 120MB. > > So, how can a 16 megapixel colour image (say 6MB grayscale image) > compete with a 42MB file? > > Is this correct or am I missing something? >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Film vs Digital
2005-12-08 by Tony Riley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.