Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Film vs Digital

Re: [Digital BW] Film vs Digital

2005-12-08 by Tony Riley

A 16megapixel camera gives an 8bit RGB file of around 48MB.

Stop being a diehard !

TonyR
Show quoted textHide quoted text
 On 08/12/2005 11:15:06, garethjolly wrote:
> I'll confess, I'm a film die hard.
> 
> But I recently saw a very impressive print from a Canon 16 megapixel SLR.
> 
> It would have been maybe 1.2 x 40 cm.
> 
> Now, logic tells me film should be better.  I scan a B&W image at 4000
> dpi - it resolves down to a level where the grain is just perceptible
> as film grain using Tri X developed in Xtol.  That yields a 42MB file
> with 16 bit grayscale.  And that's B&W so a colour file would be
> around 120MB.
> 
> So, how can a 16 megapixel colour image (say 6MB grayscale image)
> compete with a 42MB file?
> 
> Is this correct or am I missing something?
>

Re: [Digital BW] Film vs Digital

2005-12-08 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

Tony Riley wrote:

>A 16megapixel camera gives an 8bit RGB file of around 48MB.
>
>Stop being a diehard !
>  
>
If it's only resolution that you are interested in, those figures tell 
the story.

Film (esp. B&W negative) has a much broader espouse latitude and a 
generally finer gradation of tonality. However, even if you have that 
information, the trick is getting more onto a digital print or a silver 
print from a film negative.  There are also silver based emulsions (like 
Kodak HIE) that you cannot recreate the tonal effects from simply by 
running a Photoshop filter on and then converting to B&W..
Keith

 
Keith Krebs

"Just some guy," caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer 
User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo 
Publications), at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/
and  the Multiverse's largest Canon printer User  Community at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon-printers
"For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together 
guys"

Re: [Digital BW] Film vs Digital

2005-12-08 by djon43

Some aren't going transition for a while, if ever, because current
concepts should be retired within in a year or two. After all, who
wants to get stuck with $10,000 worth of antiquated EOS or Nikon
digital SLR concept?

One reported factor should be the new concave chip from Kodak et
al...higher-than-10MP resolution, designed specifically to facilitate
much smaller cameras and lenses: allegedly Leica's perpetually-pending
digital M, which would involve Panasonic.
 
Another is Konica/Minolta/Sony's alliance, which is about to produce a
much higher resolution, image stabalized digital SLR as well.

Why "go digital" just because it's available? If one's happy with
one's film strategy, why change? Perhaps one would move instead to a
larger or smaller film format, just for the aesthetics. Or perhaps one
would rather move from B&W prints to B&W videos? :-)


> A 16megapixel camera gives an 8bit RGB file of around 48MB.
> 
> Stop being a diehard !
> 
> TonyR
> 
> 
>  On 08/12/2005 11:15:06, garethjolly wrote:
> > I'll confess, I'm a film die hard.
> > 
> > But I recently saw a very impressive print from a Canon 16
megapixel SLR.
>

Re: [Digital BW] Film vs Digital

2005-12-08 by Walt Mucha

>A 16megapixel camera gives an 8bit RGB file of around 48MB.

And lets not forget that digital has no grain. There's also
economics to consider. If you shoot a lot of film the savings
on processing will pay for the camera in short order. My 1DS
Mk2 paid for itself in 4 months. Your milage may vary.

Regards, Walt

http://www.kauaiphotos.biz

Re: [Digital BW] Film vs Digital

2005-12-08 by Megan Milligan

Digital Photo Pro magazine has a really good article on several methods for converting color images to black and white, and it goes way beyond just converting them to grayscale.  It's the issue with a BW of Sharon Stone on the cover.
   
  Megan


 

test'; ">
			
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
 Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Film vs Digital

2005-12-08 by Mark Savoia

Was she converted?
:)
Mark

On Dec 8, 2005, at 6:11 PM, Megan Milligan wrote:

> It's the issue with a BW of Sharon Stone on the cover.

Re: [Digital BW] Film vs Digital

2005-12-08 by Megan Milligan

I think so.  She was mostly composited.
   
  M.

Mark Savoia <mark@ctphoto.com> wrote:
  Was she converted?
:)
Mark

On Dec 8, 2005, at 6:11 PM, Megan Milligan wrote:

> It's the issue with a BW of Sharon Stone on the cover.



Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.




  SPONSORED LINKS 
        Digital wedding photography   Learn digital photography   Digital photography college     Digital photography   Digital photography web site   Digital photography course 
    
---------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    
    Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" on the web.
    
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

    
---------------------------------
  

  



 

test'; ">
			
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
 Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.