This post is a message to the printer and ink manufacturers to complain about the current limited availability of printer/ink combinations for B&W output. In recent posts Nij and George DeWolfe have both mentioned their Epson 7000 24" printers setup with Piezo Pro24 software and inks. http://prographics.epson.com/products/stypro7000/index.html http://www.inkjetmall.com/store/piezographyBW.html (Now my EAM Piezo prints are still warm-neutral but I am taking on a definite greenish tinge of envy. I hope you guys will keep us updated on your experiences and offer some quality comparisons to other methods.) I know we are talking $2,580 for the Piezo side of these systems. I have heard about $4,000 for the 7000 and an additional $5,000 for the RIP. So I am assuming a total investment of $11,000 to $12,000. Now at the other end of the scale we have people using native CYMK inks in their desktop printers with price points as low as $129 for say an Epson Stylus Photo 780. (HP, Canon and others are also making better and better inkjet printers that are competitive in price and quality) I don't want to debate the merits of this approach at the moment but I do want to point out that people such as John Paul Caponigro, have written articles on how to do this and should be taken seriously. Moving up the price curve from there to a more solid, wider inkjet such as the Epson Stylus Photo 1280 at $499 with a CIS ($225) and alternate quad/hex inks (MIS, Piezo, ???) $225 to $390, perhaps the Piezo software $375, this hits a price of $1,150 to $1,500. The next step would be an Epson 3000 (ancient technology but wider) at $995 with a set of quad ink cartridges hits $1,500. So where do we go from $1,500? The next step would be an Epson 5000 ($3,500) or and Epson 7000 ($4,000) with MIS quad cartridges and refill kits. (I would really like to hear from anyone using these printer/inks combinations. Big question, is the $5,000 rip required?) After that it looks like a jump to over $10,000 to get into the Epson 7000, 9000, 10000 type professional printers with the Piezo Pro 24 and RIPs. Hello manufacturers!!! Are you listening?!? There are some rather huge price range gaps that appear to be dead empty of any products for making B&W prints! There is a lesson for you in the recent mid- format scanner price drops of the Nikon 8000 and Polaroid 120. People literally lined up to pay the $2,700 to $3,200 prices for these units. I believe there is a strong market for a B&W printing system in the $2,000 to $3,000 range that offers improved paper handling and tonality over the $1,500 and lower priced systems. There is a huge market that has been identified by the horrible term "prosumer" which I take to mean advanced amateurs, part time pros, and beginning pros that are willing to purchase photo equipment one or two steps below full-blown professional equipment. The 35mm camera companies seem to have pegged this rather well and are offering many great products to this market. The digital printer and the B&W ink manufactures need to realize that there is this a large customer base that is absolutely devoted to photography but derive little or no income from their efforts. "Amateur" is not a word to describe these people because their level of skill and passion often meets or exceeds many professionals. However, their buying decisions are very different. A professional you can sit down and do a cost analysis to determine if it is a good business decision. This other group of non-profit artists are forced to examine their "disposable income" to make their decision. I think the market exists. Please fill it and make yourselves some money. And let us hear from you! Sincerely, Martin Wesley
Message
The B&W Print System Gap
2001-07-30 by mwesley250@earthlink.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.