Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: 2200 vs. 2400 (Qimage challenge)

2005-12-09 by scott_now_coming

I'm assuming you own QImage. Make a print through QI and then one 
through PS or whatever you are printing through.

IMO, QI's pyrimid interpolation  (as well as Vector) is better than 
anything that Photoshop has to offer.

But, to each his own...

Scott

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, David Keenan 
<ausdlk@s...> wrote:
>
> >>"no need for Qimage ..."
> 
> >Are you serious?
> 
> >QImage is THE printing program to use, no matter what printer you 
are using.
> 
> Scott --
> 
> I have used Qimage in my former Photoshop -> Qimage -> QTRGui -> 
2200 workflow.
> 
> I have read of all of the advantages of Qimage especially related 
to resizing of images. But to be honest it's never been really clear 
what it is actually doing for me in the way of improving my printed 
images. (Recently my experience had it unexpectedly reducing the size 
of a 5x7 image printed within a 8.5x11 page for some unknown reason.)
> 
> I used Qimage basically because of the hype and my faith that it is 
doing what everyone says it does.
> 
> But I cannot say for certainty that I have ever SEEN a visual 
difference in prints that I have made.
> 
> I'd be welling to pay for the postage if you (or anyone) would send 
me two prints that will everything else being equal that was printed 
with and without Qimage in the path where the difference is obvious.
> 
> The challenge is on... :)
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> David Keenan, ausdlk@s... on 12/8/2005
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.