Digital BW, The Print

Yes I believe that is what I said.  ;-)

Now if only I could get my hands on some of those Nanochromes...If the black
density is over 2 with longevity comparable to the UCs then I am really
interested. 

> From: john dean <deanwork2003@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:19:36 -0000
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Max Black reading with Epson k2 and k3 compared
> 
> So, the answer is no change in DMax with K3 Matte black but there is
> improvement with the Photo black, or what? I'm not that worried about
> it, I'm just curious.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale
> <stevekale@b...> wrote:
>> 
>> John 
>> 
>> The Matte black ink is exactly the same.  There is improvement in the OK
>> ink.
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> 
>>> From: john dean <deanwork2003@y...>
>>> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:28:28 -0000
>>> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
>>> Subject: [Digital BW] Max Black reading with Epson k2 and k3 compared
>>> 
>>> Are you guys seeing an substantial improvement in the deepest black
>>> reading with the Epsn K3 over previous Ultrachrome. I know you should
>>> have some  highlight advantage, but what about blacks? I am primarily
>>> interested in the 7800/9800 with our without a rip.
>>> 
>>> John  
>>>