Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Film vs Digital

2005-12-09 by Steven Karafyllakis

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Greg" 
<dfaprinting@y...> wrote:
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Steven 
> Karafyllakis" <steve@s...> wrote:
> > 
> > Pixel dimensions on my Canon 5D (12.8MP about 42MB RGB) are: 
4368 x 
> > 2912. You need to feed an Epson a minimum of 200ppi to get good 
> > image quality, that divides out to an image size of 21.85 x 
14.56 
> > inches. Un-interpolated, with no noise or "grain" up to ISO 400, 
>

 
> I bet if the image is nice and sharp, and low in noise I can get 
those 
> images up to 44x30 (interpolated of course) without a problem 
(little 
> to no loss of detail). Focus is critical, and so is low noise. 
Jpeg 
> artifacts will scream at you when you increase like that, so will 
noise 
> blocks.
>

Yep, I'll bet you can. As for jpeg, I'm in the 'Raw is King' camp. 
It makes for a good filter: if I don't like the image well enough to 
give it the processing time and effort, then it doesn't deserve to 
live anyway!

Steve Karafyllakis

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.