Josh- A few thoughts. This is an extremely large reversal and my first idea would be to not spray the surface before printing. Secondly, I'd try the EEM paper type. Thirdly, you might have to use a RIP for ink limiting. If you are using the 2400 driver, you could try ink limiting on the order of 5%. I found none of this useful (I didn't try a RIP) on the 2400 when I had reversals, and my reversals were very modest compared to yours. My QC comment was about the Premier Hot Press Smooth and Textured. Both showed extremely bad QC, and the coating on the smooth was inconsistent and often damaged. Such surfaces would make it impossible to print a useful target. Walt --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "joshhackney" <joshhackney@g...> wrote: > > > Steve, > > Someone posted about Premier Luster Rag recently - I think it was Walt, as he described > his own "Paper Chase" (sorry Clayton). I recall him describing some QC problems. > > I have been on and off with this paper since July. It's nice and heavy (325gsm), but there > are a few things I don't like. 1. It's got a real curl to it. 2. It has a pronounced weave - > looks like linen or canvas - not sure how else to describe it. 3. With the UC inks, there > was a serious gloss differential, but this was controllable with PrintShield. > > I just did some quick tests with K3/matte black, and followed the directions on the IJA site. > I sprayed it with PrintShield BEFORE profiling so as to prevent smudges. The 98% patch is > at 2.025, but the 100% patch reverses to 1.876. That was produced with the following > settings. ABW, VFA media type, 2880, high speed, neutral, light. You have more > experience with ABW than me. Do you have any suggestions on eliminating the reversal? > Stepping down to 1440 still produced a reversal, and the dmax values are less. (Dry time > for all these readings was minimal.) > > Best. > > Josh >
Message
Re: PremierArt Photo Luster Rag
2005-12-10 by wwodets
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.