Thanks Clayton -- I know I wouldn't go back to film too because of the ease of processing the results. Perhaps this is why I don't make the change --it has to be made for reasons of quality rather than convenience. When the quality is better and affordable then I will reconsider. For wildlife photographers digital is already there -- for landscape maybe not. Pete --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@c...> wrote: > > Hello Pete, > > >I would be interested to know if I am talking garbage -- I admit > >I have limited experience of the subject. I'll stick with film for > >now - > > No, you aren't talking garbage. Everything you listed is true, but as > you say, you are speaking with limited digital experience. Consider > this: the vast majority (probably in the high 90's %-wise) of film > photographers who try digital capture don't go back. There must be a > reason for that, in spite of all the things you mentioned. > > The hardest part of making the transition is accepting/realizing that > digital sensors are not an electrical version of film. I went through > a mourning period where I tried unsuccessfully to make my images look > like the Tri-X I loved for years. I finally understood that I was > dealing with a completely different medium, so I stopped trying to > make it be something else and began learning how to use it. What I > think all serious photographers have found is that there are > workarounds for the things you discussed. Film has certain advantages > over digital, but the reverse is also true. > > It isn't the same as film. Once you accept that, a whole new > wonderful world opens up. An analogy might be a painter who switches > from acrylic to oil, or vice-versa. This isn't meant to change your > mind. I think you should continue as you are. When the time is right > it will be compelling in its own unique way for you, and it won't be a > decision to be made. You'll just want to do it. > > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm >
Message
Re: Film vs Digital
2005-12-10 by petexp2
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.