The one problem with waiting is that there is a learning curve involved with handling digital. Just like there was with film. So, the longer you wait, the longer it will be before you can master the inevitable new medium.
(Oh yes. I still miss the look of the old Ansco V film in 4x5. But, it's gone.)
Tom Baker
petexp2 <kafoozalem@...> wrote:
Ken -- you make some very good points as does the very balanced
article at Clarkvision.com. It confirms for me that I am not yet
ready to plunge into digital camera's. However I would be there like
a shot if I were a wildlife photographer. Presently I have the time
to spend on afterwork which is very considerable with scanned film.
If I didn't then digital would become essential.
I await the 25MP digital camera for below $2000! Will I be waiting
forever?? LOL.
Pete
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "kenstrain2000"
<kenstrain2000@y...> wrote:
>
> You could have a look at the measurements presented at
clarkvision.com
> on this subject, for example, (although mainly about colour there is
> some info on B&W). Then you could think how to exploit the benefits
> and avoid the problems with your style of photography. It is very
> likely possible if you want to, of course not for every possible
style.
>
> It is not hard to put noise in your skies if you desire. Nor are
> blown highlights mandatory. Digital capture is just another tool
and
> not a bad one (of course film is fine too).
>
> For some subjects I can get great resolution from my digital
cameras
> (>10k pixel square images or more from a cheap DSLR using panorama
> tools) -better than I ever got from my SL66. Doesn't suit your
style?
> No problem!
>
> What about "combinez" for as much depth of field as with large
format
> tilting? Too much work? I'd argue not much more work than it took
to
> dev a 4x5 sheet in two-bath.
>
> Half way through a day the light changes from "Tech Pan" to "Delta
> 400" - no problem, I can make characteristic curves as I like in the
> raw converter much better than I ever could with mono developers
etc.
> Also a mistake does not ruin the "whole film".
>
> Want more dynamic range? Well neg film has great dynamic range but
> appalling resolution in the shadows. Easy (in principle) to mimik
that
> by using noise reduction in the shadows (actually very tricky to get
> it right, I find, but I think that is my lack of competance). Or by
> stacking images (hard though, even for static subjects).
>
> For me the two real advantages of digital capture are the 30 times
or
> so better sensitivity to light (OK, not with quite the same
> resolution, yet, a factor of ~2 to go there), and the option to
choose
> the characterisitic curve. The former is invaluable on a mountain
> top, the latter helps a lot in many lighting conditions.
> A big disadvantage is initial purchase cost, but it is getting
there,
> slowly.
>
> Great fun and very rewarding. Not a replacement in all respects.
>
> Ken
>
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Film vs Digital
2005-12-10 by Tom Baker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.