Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-12 by Peter Marshall

It does partly reflect where I live, as these processes are all very 
humidity dependent, and the Thames valley is thus not a good place to 
store film. Storage is nearly all in archival sleeves for film, but not 
in temperature and humidity controlled environment, and not in inert gas 
atmosphere, so certainly not optimal.

Vinegar is coming to us all with tri-acetate emulsions (including all 
35mm since the early 1950s). I think the best advice is to get as much 
transferred to digital as soon as you can, as well as keeping the film 
as well as you can. Older material is likely to keep better, although 
again, nitrate base is unstable 
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/technical/storage_nitrate.jhtml?id=0.1.4.11.12.12&lc=en

Polyester based films are good candidates for long term storage, as also 
are glass plates and I think collodion.

Regards

Peter Marshall
petermarshall@...     
_________________________________________________________________
My London Diary	              http://mylondondiary.co.uk/
London's Industrial Heritage: http://petermarshallphotos.co.uk/
The Buildings of London etc:  http://londonphotographs.co.uk/
and elsewhere......



djon43 wrote:

>Peter's experience indicates exceptionally bad processing and/or
>storage, and or profoundly bad personal luck. 
>
>I have a collection of 35 and 828 film of various types going back to
>1939 (my mother's home-processed Anscochrome)...none of it is
>"deteriorating" though my father's Kodachromes from Korean War are
>shifting colors (though not his earlier Kodachromes from Panama), as
>are some of my own Kodachromes (though not my E4) from 1970-75. I also
>have family negatives going back into the 1800s that are not
>"deteriorating." 
>
>I have however seen 8X10 negatives from WWII whose emulsions were
>bubbling off. 
>
>IMO one should take good care of one's negatives as long as is
>feasible, counting on digital storage in the event people in the
>future think there's a reason to retrieve our wonderful images.
>
>Peter Marshall <petermarshall@c...> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>One of my reasons for moving towards digital storage is the rate at 
>>which my analogue negatives are deteriorating. Almost all modern 35mm 
>>negs for example are on tri-acetate base, which is not stable. 
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated.
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
>If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
>
>Please follow these basic guidelines:
>- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
>- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice.
>- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership.
>- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in the Files section:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
>BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>  
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.