Greg wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "kenstrain2000" > <kenstrain2000@y...> wrote: > > > > Yes, it should be no surprise that one of the manufacturers I had in > > mind was actually Hahnemuehle, and there are many examples of > > "needless" confusion caused by marketing these under different names. > > > Yes there are others, but I can't remember their names either. I know > that the Inkjetart MC gloss and luster papers are the same as one of > the Epson gloss and luster papers, but you'd have to look through the > forum over there to find out which exact papers they are. For cases like this - where a retailer doesn't do anything other than rebrand an existing brand of paper, like (a fictional company) MyMediaMart wanting to sell HPR 308gms rebranded to be MyMediaMart Photo Rag 308gms, then I can see why people would want to know who is rebranding whom. Even at that, it would seem difficult for MyMediaMart to use the rebranded paper for much more than a loss-leader since Hahnemuhle's wholesale price on it would have to include profit for Hahnemuhle, making it more expensive for MyMediaMart and thus making it very difficult for MyMediaMart to compete at retail with the original HPR branded paper. Wanting to trace back farther in the chain than this though, is of questionable help. For me at least it just adds confusion without increasing clarity. -- Bruce Watson
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: paper industry
2005-12-15 by hogarth@snappydsl.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.