Digital BW, The Print

In the US this is incorrect. Epson or any other concern doing business
cannot negate a warranty based on use of competing supplies. It is
considered illegal restraint of trade. Instead they must prove in
court that the supply directly causes harm and seek remedy against the
 supplier, Not the consumer. That is not to say that one of their
retail sources may not try to get away with it by assuming their
customers won't know better.

Regards
Duane


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "glemasurier"
<george.lemasurier@m...> wrote:
>
> I went to a camera shop to buy a 2400, but their printing "expert"
said some 
> things that gave me pause; questions I'd like to pose here:

> 2. He had heard of people using MIS eboni instead of the MK, but
warned that 
> if the print head failed, the warranty would be voided. Has anyone
had a print 
> head fail? Wondering how often this happens and how others have handled 
> (rationalized) this risk?
> 
> Cheers,
> George Le Masurier
>