--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "bghess_sp" <bghess_sp@y...> wrote: > ... I think the main > difference in quality with the new printers (inks) is the lack of > bronzing and metamerism on glossy papers. I could never get what I > considered to be really great results with the 2200 (for B&W). With > the 4800, it has become almost effortless. The ABW driver in the Epson > software does, in my opinion, an excellent job. The B&W prints are > completely neutral, absolutely no metamerism, and the bronzing is > >all but eliminated. > Ben I used an Epson 4000 until recently, now have the 7800, and I also still have my B/W darkroom and enlarger. I agree with the above post by Ben. Results from the 7800 (or I assume the 4800) are great on glossy paper. I used Roy Harrington's Quadtone Rip with the 4000 but my prints still suffered from bronzing (luster or glossy papers). The new K3 inks have eliminated that problem (only used the ABW mode so far). Also, I find that gloss differential can be eliminated by spraying with Premier Art Print Shield. Ken
Message
Re: Eps 2400 vs 4000- Any B&W image quality differences?
2005-12-19 by kenseidman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.